Cambodia vs Egypt property: title, instalments and FX risk

Side by side (tap a row for the nuance)

Who should pick which

An apartment can rise in EGP and lose value in dollars

Egypt’s primary investment risk is the gap between nominal price and the value of capital in a hard currency. In March 2024, the move to a more flexible exchange rate drove an official depreciation of roughly 50%, with the dollar moving from around EGP31 to approximately EGP49–50. A home that rose 30% in pounds through that period could still have fallen in USD terms.

Developers respond in different ways: they increase EGP list prices, add foreign-currency clauses, reduce cash discounts, index future instalments or quote selected overseas buyers directly in USD. The purchaser needs the full model rather than the first cheque: currency of each payment, conversion mechanism, developer variation rights, remaining debt and the cost of selling before the schedule is complete.

Cambodia’s investment-condominium market operates largely in USD. This does not guarantee appreciation or cure an overpriced project, but it allows entry price, rent and exit to be compared in one currency. A nominally inexpensive Egyptian unit can therefore become the more expensive exposure after exchange-rate and indexation effects.

Two properties of 4,000 square metres is a baseline, not a universal answer

Under the general regime of Egypt’s Law 230 of 1996, a non-Egyptian may own no more than two properties for private residence of the buyer and family, each no larger than 4,000 square metres and not classified as an antiquity. Prime-ministerial exemptions are possible, while new communities, tourism zones and Sinai are governed by additional rules and decisions.

The area limit rarely constrains an apartment buyer, but the number of properties and territorial route matter for a portfolio investor. A developer may be authorised to sell to foreigners in a particular area, yet the land allocation and applicable authority decision should be evidenced rather than inferred from a full-ownership slogan. Any restriction on use, demolition or disposal under the chosen route also needs current confirmation.

Cambodia limits foreign ownership differently. A buyer can hold multiple qualifying units but cannot own the land or ground floor, and foreigners collectively cannot exceed 70% of private-unit floor area in one building. The classification is simpler, although the project’s available foreign quota still needs documentary confirmation.

A long Egyptian instalment plan is a developer finance product

Egyptian projects are frequently sold over seven, eight or ten years. A low initial payment improves access but does not create a discount. Finance can be embedded in the contract price, while the cash price may be materially lower. Indexation, service charges, club fees, finishing packages and assignment charges can add to the headline amount.

Four figures should be compared before purchase: total scheduled price, rapid-payment price, realistic completed-market value and the balance a secondary buyer must assume on assignment. If the developer continues to release later phases with lower deposits or longer plans, the private owner competes directly with the original seller.

Cambodian schedules are generally shorter and more closely tied to construction milestones, though protection remains contract-dependent. Delay remedies, refund rights, area variation, completion security and the point of strata-title issuance require review. In both markets, instalments are useful only when they do not conceal overpricing or weak delivery security.

Cairo, the New Capital, the North Coast and the Red Sea are four separate markets

Egypt cannot be underwritten as one residential market. Cairo is driven by population, work, education and long-term housing. The New Administrative Capital is a bet on government relocation, infrastructure and future occupancy. The North Coast is shaped by a short summer season and premium domestic demand. Hurghada and Sharm El Sheikh rely on international tourism, air access and special territorial rules.

Each segment has a different exit risk. Cairo requires district, transport and registration-chain analysis. The New Capital requires evidence of phase delivery, infrastructure and future competing supply. The North Coast depends on service charges, season and a limited use window. Red Sea property needs operator, licensing, travel-security and foreign-right checks.

Cambodia is geographically simpler. Phnom Penh dominates the investment case, while Sihanoukville and Siem Reap need separate, more cautious models. That provides fewer opportunities but reduces the risk of treating a resort product as if it were a conventional urban apartment.

An Egyptian private contract is not the same as registered title

Egyptian property has often traded through chains of private contracts, signature-validity judgments or powers of attorney without complete title registration. Such documents can create obligations between the parties, but protection against third parties, mortgageability and resale depend much more heavily on registration. The buyer needs to establish not only who signs the contract but what land right supports the project and whether the unit can be registered.

In new communities, due diligence includes the land-allocation decision, developer obligations to the state authority, construction licence, assignment permission and authority consent. A large corporate name or government master plan does not prove that a particular phase is legally or financially secured.

Cambodia has the same distinction between an SPA and completed ownership. During construction, the contract defines obligations; the foreign buyer’s strongest protection arrives only when the co-owned building and unit strata title are lawfully registered. In both countries, review should move from land and permits to contract and finally to registrable ownership.

Megaproject upside only matters when there is a workable exit

Egypt can create scale that Cambodia cannot: new cities, coastal development zones and large Gulf-funded projects can change infrastructure and buyer perception across an entire district. Early-stage exposure may deliver substantial upside. An apartment owner benefits, however, only if the project is delivered, the district becomes occupied, the right is registrable and a secondary buyer can assume the remaining obligations.

Exit often takes the form of a developer-approved assignment. The seller needs a current payment record, consent, payment of the assignment fee and confirmation that the new buyer may continue the schedule. If the developer discounts a new phase or offers a longer plan, the private seller may need to cut the price. Disposal tax based on gross consideration further reduces proceeds.

Cambodia offers less megaproject upside but a more readable USD model. Its weakness is a thin resale market and dependence on the exact developer. In both countries, the investable asset is not a future-city promise; it is a legally and financially credible exit path.

Expert view

Egypt’s resort instalments can make the entry price look unusually low, while title completion, EGP exposure and developer delivery carry much of the real risk. Phnom Penh is a more conventional dollar-based urban rental proposition. I would examine registrable ownership, payment protection, service charges, weak-season demand and the future buyer beyond another off-plan lead.

Elvira Shamuratova

Founder of Elvira Cambodia · Associate Director at Pointer Property · strategic partner of NovAsia

Expert page →

Frequently asked questions

Cambodia: the shared legal checks

The country-specific rules belong in one guide, not repeated in full on every comparison.

Foreign ownership and strata title · Taxes, fees and cost of ownership

What to compare next

• Cambodia vs Mauritius — a nearby decision case.
• Cambodia vs Morocco — a nearby decision case.
• Cambodia vs Mexico — a nearby decision case.
• All comparisons by region — the compact index without repeating the full guide.