NovAsia

Amartya Properties — Bali Villas and Land Projects

Prepared by: NovAsia Editorial Team

Amartya Properties has a mixed catalogue rather than a single villa development. Its Ubud offerings focus on villas, while projects around Tabanan include residential plots and houses. The distinction matters more than the shared branding: an existing villa, an unfinished home and a vacant plot create very different obligations for the buyer. The company website identifies PT Bangun Rumah Idaman as the owner and manager of the Amartya Properties brand. It does not establish that this entity holds title to every site or will necessarily be the contracting seller for each unit.

NameAmartya Properties
BrandAmartya Properties
Identity evidence
  • This profile is based on the listed public sources; the company’s role in a specific contract must be checked separately.

Who appears in the public record

Amartya Properties has a mixed catalogue rather than a single villa development. Its Ubud offerings focus on villas, while projects around Tabanan include residential plots and houses. The distinction matters more than the shared branding: an existing villa, an unfinished home and a vacant plot create very different obligations for the buyer. The company website identifies PT Bangun Rumah Idaman as the owner and manager of the Amartya Properties brand. It does not establish that this entity holds title to every site or will necessarily be the contracting seller for each unit.

What the sources support

There is enough primary material to establish an identifiable brand, its stated corporate operator and several named locations. There is not enough to certify the projects as legally clear or fully delivered. Project marketing has inconsistencies in naming and completion language, and it does not disclose the full chain from landholder to contractual seller and payment beneficiary. Those gaps call for documentary reconciliation at unit level. They are not, on their own, evidence that a particular project is defective; equally, a polished catalogue is not proof that a particular purchase structure is sound.

Developer evidence

BrandAmartya Properties
Identity evidence
  • Public materials and sources disclosed at the foot of this page.
Public record
  • The developer says it has operated since January 2024 and reports six developments comprising more than 100 units. That headline is not a verified delivery record. Its current projects page displays seven entries, and some cards combine different names: the Sisin Uma heading refers to Vana Peliatan in the description, while Garden City is presented with Kerta Residence copy. The Indonesian and English homepages also describe 21 Ubud villas differently, as finished and as nearing completion respectively. Individual Campuhan Ubud villas are advertised on accommodation platforms, but this does not verify completion or handover across the entire scheme. No independently verified schedule of completed projects or buyer handovers was available in the sources reviewed.
Unknowns
  • The legal entity, contracting party, land interest and terms of a selected property must be checked from documents before payment.

What is known and what to verify

What is known

  • Amartya Properties has a mixed catalogue rather than a single villa development. Its Ubud offerings focus on villas, while projects around Tabanan include residential plots and houses. The distinction matters more than the shared branding: an existing villa, an unfinished home and a vacant plot create very different obligations for the buyer. The company website identifies PT Bangun Rumah Idaman as the owner and manager of the Amartya Properties brand. It does not establish that this entity holds title to every site or will necessarily be the contracting seller for each unit.

What to verify for the address

  • The legal entity, contracting party, land interest and terms of a selected property must be checked from documents before payment.

FAQ

Who would actually sign my Amartya contract?
PT Bangun Rumah Idaman is named on the official website as the entity behind the brand. The website does not confirm that it is the landowner or seller for every listing. The named counterparty must match the proposed transaction documents, and any different landholder or payee needs a documented explanation.
Does the Campuhan Ubud listing offer freehold ownership?
A legacy Amartya project page labels the villas leasehold, not freehold. That description is only a starting point: the signed agreement and underlying land rights determine the term, renewal options and what the buyer can transfer. Do not read a marketing use of the word 'own' as evidence of land title.
Do the published project totals prove a delivery history?
No. Amartya publishes its own project and unit totals, while its catalogue and two homepage language versions contain inconsistencies. Some villas are advertised for guest stays, but this does not establish the handover status of all homes. Request a unit-by-unit completion record for the development under consideration.
Public record
  • The developer says it has operated since January 2024 and reports six developments comprising more than 100 units. That headline is not a verified delivery record. Its current projects page displays seven entries, and some cards combine different names: the Sisin Uma heading refers to Vana Peliatan in the description, while Garden City is presented with Kerta Residence copy. The Indonesian and English homepages also describe 21 Ubud villas differently, as finished and as nearing completion respectively. Individual Campuhan Ubud villas are advertised on accommodation platforms, but this does not verify completion or handover across the entire scheme. No independently verified schedule of completed projects or buyer handovers was available in the sources reviewed.
Unknowns
  • The legal entity, contracting party, land interest and terms of a selected property must be checked from documents before payment.

Projects and buyer context

Product type is the first useful way to compare Amartya listings. Campuhan Ubud and the Peliatan offering are marketed as villas; Bantas and Meliling are advertised as land plots; Kerta Residence is presented as housing. An older company page describes Campuhan Ubud as leasehold, but it does not supply a buyer-specific lease agreement, extension terms or the underlying land certificate. The brand's terms also say prices, specifications and availability may change. There is no dependable, like-for-like public price schedule from which to calculate an entry budget, and the marketing material does not establish any enforceable rental return.

Ubud is only one part of the portfolio. The public project directory places villa offerings around Peliatan and Campuhan in Gianyar, plots or housing at Bantas, Kediri and Meliling in Tabanan, and another offering around Yeh Sumbul in Jembrana. These are not interchangeable locations from a rental or construction perspective. A buyer of a building plot needs to establish legal access and permitted use before designing a home; a villa buyer needs the exact address, operating context and any limits on short-stay use. Broad references to Bali do little to answer those questions.

Delivery history
  • The developer says it has operated since January 2024 and reports six developments comprising more than 100 units. That headline is not a verified delivery record. Its current projects page displays seven entries, and some cards combine different names: the Sisin Uma heading refers to Vana Peliatan in the description, while Garden City is presented with Kerta Residence copy. The Indonesian and English homepages also describe 21 Ubud villas differently, as finished and as nearing completion respectively. Individual Campuhan Ubud villas are advertised on accommodation platforms, but this does not verify completion or handover across the entire scheme. No independently verified schedule of completed projects or buyer handovers was available in the sources reviewed.

Observable track record

The developer says it has operated since January 2024 and reports six developments comprising more than 100 units. That headline is not a verified delivery record. Its current projects page displays seven entries, and some cards combine different names: the Sisin Uma heading refers to Vana Peliatan in the description, while Garden City is presented with Kerta Residence copy. The Indonesian and English homepages also describe 21 Ubud villas differently, as finished and as nearing completion respectively. Individual Campuhan Ubud villas are advertised on accommodation platforms, but this does not verify completion or handover across the entire scheme. No independently verified schedule of completed projects or buyer handovers was available in the sources reviewed.

What to check

Complete0 of 4
What to checkChecklist0 of 4

Sources

Show sources · 10
  • Amartya Properties — About Us
  • Amartya Properties — English homepage
  • Amartya Properties — Indonesian homepage
  • Amartya Properties — Projects
  • Amartya Properties — Terms and Conditions
  • Amartya Bali — Campuhan Ubud project presentation
  • Booking.com — Amartya Villa Unit 24 by Betterplace
  • Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI — PP No. 18 Tahun 2021
  • Kejaksaan RI — Halo JPN: foreign ownership of land
  • Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum RI — SIMBG building approvals and SLF