Projects and buyer context
The commercial proposition is hotel development finance or participation, rather than a published catalogue of apartments for sale. CUBE’s investment page gives an estimated total capital budget of US$15–18 million and models a project-level internal rate of return of roughly 15–18%. Elsewhere on that page, an “up to 15%” return is promoted. These figures refer to the developer’s own forecasts and are not interchangeable measures of an investor’s net cash yield.
No public offer reviewed set out a fully documented entry price, the investor’s precise economic entitlement or a binding payment schedule. Anyone assessing the figures needs the current financial model, a breakdown of development and operating costs, and the actual participation agreement. A hotel-wide budget is not the price of an ownership interest.
CROSS Bali Uluwatu is proposed for Pecatu on the Bukit Peninsula, within South Kuta, Badung. Both project parties place the site approximately 200 metres from Suluban Beach. That is a useful location detail, but it says little on its own about achievable room rates, year-round occupancy or the hotel’s eventual cash flow.
Even the proposed room count should be treated as subject to confirmation. Cross’s December 2025 announcement referred to 120 keys; CUBE’s project page lists 123, while an earlier CUBE announcement discussed up to 150. The difference matters because the final approved inventory affects project cost and operating assumptions. An investor should work from the latest approved plans rather than select whichever published number makes the model look better.