EVDEkimi in Bali: properties, management and purchase due diligence

Who appears in the public record

EVDEkimi's proposition starts with existing buildings rather than empty land. The brand acquires or works with properties, renovates them and markets the result alongside a managed rental operation. That is a meaningful distinction from a conventional new-build developer: a buyer needs to understand the rights already attached to the site, the scope of authorised alterations and the commercial arrangements that survive the renovation.

Its own listings include Sacred Jungle Ubud in Penestanan, the Sekar and Silawana complexes, and individual villas and apartments marketed as ready for use. Independent property listings also identify EVDEkimi as the developer of Sekar and Silawana in Gianyar. Neither the marketing pages nor those listings, however, establish which Indonesian company will be the seller, lease grantor or recipient of funds in any particular transaction.

This is a business model built around earning rental income without managing every guest stay personally. It may appeal to an overseas buyer, provided the underlying property rights and management contract stand up to scrutiny. A renovated building is not automatically a low-risk acquisition, and a projected rental stream is not the same thing as a documented obligation to pay.

What the sources support

EVDEkimi has a substantive official site, item-level listings and a published purchase process. Third-party property catalogues corroborate the developer brand associated with Sekar and Silawana. These sources are enough to describe the proposition; they are not a legal or financial audit of the organisation behind it.

The public information reviewed does not establish the precise contracting Indonesian entity for Sacred Jungle Ubud, Sekar or Silawana. Nor does it supply independently checked land rights and applicable building documentation for each saleable unit. It is also unclear from the published pages which legal entity would owe the advertised fixed return or sign the property-management agreement. Missing public evidence should not be mistaken for a finding of wrongdoing.

One provision deserves special attention: EVDEkimi's purchase guide describes a US$10,000 payment before the buyer receives the property document pack, while treating notarial due diligence as optional. The same guide mentions an NIB or an IMB depending on the property. Those are not interchangeable building approvals: an NIB identifies a business, whereas the current building-permit and occupancy framework includes PBG and SLF. The relevant documents must be checked against the works actually carried out.

FAQ

Projects and buyer context

The range is wider than a single villa format. EVDEkimi advertises smaller suites and apartments, private villas and entire properties. Illustrative prices on its own pages include Sekar suites from US$128,000, selected Silawana suites at US$160,000 and a Sacred Jungle Ubud villa from US$260,000. These are published listing prices seen during the review, not a verified inventory or all-in acquisition budget. The specific unit, remaining lease term, renovation scope and transaction costs need to be priced together.

Property management is a major part of the offer. EVDEkimi says it handles marketing, guest services, maintenance and owner reporting. Its website also presents a 10% first-year return as contractual and 12% annually as projected. The forecast is not a promise. Even the first-year figure only becomes meaningful once the buyer has seen the executed wording, the obligor, the calculation base and the exclusions.

A fixed-return clause does not remove counterparty risk. Buyers should distinguish gross rental receipts from money they actually receive after management charges, maintenance, taxes and any reserve for repairs. They should also ask whether the obligation survives delays in opening and what remedies exist if the paying company fails to perform.

The portfolio is centred on the Ubud area of Gianyar rather than Bali's southern beach districts. Sacred Jungle Ubud is marketed in Penestanan; Sekar mixes villas with smaller accommodation formats; Silawana is promoted as a sloping-site complex with villas and suites. Specific developer pages for Sekar and Silawana cite the fourth quarter of 2026 as a target for redevelopment completion. They do not establish that units have been handed over or cleared for use.

The precise site matters more than the familiar Ubud label. Access by car, drainage, surrounding construction, views that may change and rights to shared amenities can all affect whether the accommodation performs as advertised. A hillside project such as Silawana warrants particular attention to the condition of retaining works and infrastructure, without assuming a defect exists.

EVDEkimi publishes a contact address in Canggu. That should not be confused with the location or title of its marketed properties, which are described primarily around Ubud.

Observable track record

EVDEkimi's catalogue separates listings described as fully ready from those still undergoing redevelopment. Hijau Villa appears in the first category; Sekar and Silawana appear in the second. This is more informative than treating every listing as a completed development. A trading villa can be examined through actual booking and cost records, while an unfinished refurbishment requires evidence of progress and a credible route to opening.

The company says its approach has been applied across more than 50 villas and apartments. That is a developer statement, not an independently verified completion count. Publicly accessible materials reviewed for this profile do not provide a property-by-property trail of occupancy approvals, verified ownership rights and independently audited rental results.

For example, Hijau Villa is described by EVDEkimi as operational, with an earnings history dating to November 2023. That makes it a potentially useful case study, but only if the buyer can see supporting transaction records, operating statements and the identity of the entity responsible for the business. The distinction matters especially when past performance is being used to sell a different project.

What to check