Casa de Canggu

The development is associated with Catur Perkasa Land, whose own portfolio lists Casa de Canggu as sold out. Pinhome identifies the developer as PT Catur Perkasa Land. The official project page sets out one clear housing proposition: the Riso, a two-bedroom, two-bathroom villa with 110 sqm of building area, a private pool, living space, kitchen and a carport. Devata Property and Pinhome describe the same one-storey design. That consistency makes it possible to identify the main product rather than treating every villa advertised around Canggu under a similar name as part of this scheme.

A single-level house can make day-to-day movement straightforward. The kitchen and dining area are part of a compact domestic layout, while the outdoor pool provides a genuine private amenity. It is not possible to tell from the public specifications how private the bedrooms feel, how much shade the courtyard receives or how wide the usable deck is. Those aspects matter for long stays and for families with young children. A claimed building area of 110 sqm is not the same as a measured indoor net area, and no verified net floor schedule has been published.

The advertised land sizes require a little more care. Catur Perkasa Land gives a starting plot size of 150 sqm; Pinhome reports 145–195 sqm, and Devata Property refers to 151–223 sqm. Another paragraph on Pinhome calls the building 115 sqm even though its own Riso specification states 110 sqm. These are not numbers to average. They may describe different plots, marketing revisions or simple errors. The buyer of a particular villa needs the boundary survey, the lot identifier and the documents showing what land and building are actually included in that purchase.

Devata Property describes Casa de Canggu as a limited development of 23 homes, a figure also repeated in several broker advertisements. The developer’s public page does not provide a numbered master plan against which that count could be independently reconciled. Pinhome shows one Riso cluster rather than a confirmed series of separately sold phases. Other names appearing in agency advertising, including separate developments elsewhere in the Catur Perkasa Land portfolio, should not be folded into Casa de Canggu without their own site plans. A few advertisements for three-bedroom or two-storey villas also use the phrase Casa de Canggu, but they do not establish a second verified Riso format.

The central purchasing question is no longer which brand-new unit the developer has left. The developer’s own website, the Pinhome project entry and the Devata Property catalogue all label the original offering sold out. Yet individual advertisements bearing the exact Casa de Canggu name were published in 2026. Brighton registered an offer on 4 July 2026 for a two-bedroom 150 sqm land / 110 sqm building villa at IDR 2.85 billion. A listing attributed to an agent named Shelly on Rumah123 and 99.co describes a 155 sqm plot, the same 110 sqm building size and an asking price of IDR 3.2 billion. A live page is evidence that an offer has been advertised, not that the owner will still sell it or that the property has been legally inspected.

This is also why the older IDR 2.78–3.95 billion range displayed by Pinhome should not be treated as a current developer price list. Pinhome prints that range next to a sold-out label. The different brokerage prices may reflect plot size, finish, furniture, actual condition or an agent’s asking strategy; no completed transaction records were found for comparison. The IDR 2.85 billion figure used as this project’s starting price is a lower observed advertisement from July 2026, not a firm quotation for stock available today. Closing costs, any transfer taxes and the contents of the sale still need individual confirmation.

Land rights are particularly consequential for an overseas buyer. Pinhome describes Casa de Canggu as offered with SHM, the Indonesian certificate associated with Hak Milik land ownership. The 99.co advertisement uses the same label. Neither listing supplies a copy of the certificate or proves that the named seller holds the title to the advertised parcel. Under Indonesia’s agrarian framework, a foreign individual cannot directly take Hak Milik land ownership in their own name. Other routes, including an eligible Hak Pakai right of use, operate under separate requirements. They are not automatic conversions of a brokerage claim that a villa is freehold.

There is a further constraint that deserves attention before discussing an overseas purchase at the advertised prices. Ministerial Decision 1241/SK-HK.02/IX/2022, still listed as in force by the Indonesian land authority at the time of review, sets a minimum of IDR 5 billion for qualifying foreign acquisitions of landed residential houses in Bali. That is above the IDR 2.85 billion and IDR 3.2 billion asking prices noted here. It does not make those prices invalid for Indonesian buyers; it does mean a foreign buyer should not assume that the usual individual foreign-homeownership pathway can be used. Any proposal to acquire contractual lease rights, corporate interests or a different title must be assessed on its own documents and lawful eligibility, not on a sales slogan.

Physical completion is a separate question from sales status. Pinhome retains an under-construction tag even as it states that all units are sold. A June 2026 Rumah123 advertisement calls a particular house ready to occupy and in good condition. Neither item establishes that all villas were handed over or that the development has a valid operational clearance. Some agency text refers to an IMB building permit, but the permit itself was not available for review. No project-specific PBG or SLF documentation was found either. Since pre-existing IMB approvals and newer PBG approvals have different histories, the relevant permit must be matched to the particular building; SLF fitness-for-use evidence should be considered separately.

Pinhome lists security, CCTV, a children’s play area, gardens and a jogging track among the development’s facilities. Devata Property describes a pool deck, a garden and parking within the individual Riso design. This is an appealing combination if the advertised shared areas actually operate as presented, but it is not evidence of a staffed management programme. No verified monthly service charge, estate rules or maintenance contract was located. Pool care, garden work, common-road upkeep, security and utilities can all affect an owner’s recurring budget. They should not be assumed to be covered by an unspecified developer package.

As a place to live, Tumbak Bayuh is best judged through ordinary routines: the school or shop a household actually uses, road access during busy periods, noise outside the compound, water pressure and the ability to park a car comfortably. The developer quotes short journeys to Batu Bolong, Berawa and Seminyak; those are promotional estimates, not dependable trip times. For rental use, the questions change. Marketing proximity to Canggu does not demonstrate occupancy, income or permission to operate short stays. Any hospitality activity must fit the property’s actual permitted use and the operator’s obligations. No verified rental operating results for Casa de Canggu were found.

The practical conclusion is that Casa de Canggu is a known villa product whose initial sales are over, with evidence of later individual advertisements but without confirmed active inventory. Its strengths are tangible: a two-bedroom, one-floor plan, private pool, carport and an identifiable inland location. The unresolved questions belong to each specific transaction — who owns the plot, whether the offer remains live, what certificate and building approvals apply, and what the buyer will pay in total. Until those points are settled, a project name and a polished advert are a useful starting point, not the basis for a binding purchase.