Asher Naii Sutthisan-Saphan Khwai

The apartment mix is focused rather than broad. Public project information shows one-bedroom layouts from about 24.5 to 37.5 sqm, split into several developer categories with different proportions and room arrangements. There are no confirmed two- or three-bedroom family formats in the published mix. What makes the smaller units worth examining is the internal planning rather than the raw square-metre number. Show-unit material includes closed kitchens, separated bedrooms, storage, a utility balcony and, in some plans, a compact extra room or work zone. For someone who cooks regularly or works from home, that separation can be more useful than a slightly larger open-plan room. It should not be assumed that every unit has the same secondary space, however. There are multiple layouts within the developer’s categories, so the exact floor plan, window orientation and furniture placement need to be checked unit by unit.

The amenity package is distributed through the building instead of being concentrated in a large clubhouse. The ground floor contains the double-height lobby, mailboxes, delivery point, part of the parking and a small garden. The second floor adds a co-working and meeting area plus a library and coffee corner alongside residential units. The eighth floor combines seven apartments with the gym, panoramic garden and rooftop pool. That is a sensible amount of shared space for a 78-unit building: there are places to work, exercise and relax without the operating complexity of a resort-scale facility deck. The trade-offs are equally tangible. Published project information shows one passenger lift, while the developer states parking at approximately 40% of units. Buyers who rely on a car should confirm whether a particular unit has any parking entitlement or practical access to spaces, and frequent lift users should judge the single-lift arrangement in the context of the building’s low unit count.

There is a genuine chronology discrepancy around completion, but not around the current state of the building. The project page originally gave Q4 2025 as the expected completion date and later showed the main construction categories at 100% in December 2025. PropertyScout records completion in 2025, while FazWaz and Hipflat label the project as completed in April 2026; a detailed May 2026 review already described it as ready to move into. The developer’s current website now calls Asher Naii ready for occupancy and ready for transfer. The cleanest interpretation is therefore that construction is complete, while the exact legal or handover milestone represented by “April 2026” remains unclear. Anyone who needs the formal condominium registration date, first transfer date or other legal milestone should verify it from the project’s registration documents rather than relying on portal metadata.

The price trail also needs context. Early launch material showed entry pricing from THB 1.95 million, Home.co.th displayed THB 2.19 million in June 2025, and both a May 2026 project review and the developer’s live site show a current headline price from THB 2.39 million. Those numbers do not prove that a specific apartment appreciated by the difference. Launch promotions, floor levels, unit sizes and remaining stock can all change between price snapshots. The useful current fact is narrower: as of 10 September 2026, the developer is still advertising completed units from THB 2.39 million and is promoting transfer-day cost support. Any such incentive should be confirmed in the reservation and sale documents for the selected unit. Open project data also reports a common fee of THB 55 per sqm per month and a one-off sinking-fund contribution of THB 500 per sqm; both should be reconfirmed before signing because ongoing costs matter as much as the entry price for a compact investment unit.

The rental market provides an early reality check without providing a guaranteed return. In late August 2026, PropertyHub carried repeated listings around THB 16,000 per month for 32 sqm units, including examples on the fifth and eighth floors. Several advertisements appear to be duplicates distributed by different agents, so the listing count should not be read as the number of occupied apartments or completed leases. Even so, the asking-rent evidence is useful because a buyer can now benchmark a proposed unit against actual competing stock in the same building rather than against a developer rental projection. The next step is to verify achieved rents, furnishing quality, agent fees, vacancy periods and any owner-paid costs. That produces a much more credible rental case than dividing a headline asking rent by a headline purchase price.