Four Oases Nyanyi

For someone comparing Bali homes, that distinction matters more than the project name. A Garden Pool buyer would have a private pool and garden terrace but not necessarily any claim to the upper balcony. A Sky Balcony buyer would use an outside staircase and private entrance, with the rice-field-facing balcony as the central outdoor feature. The Sky unit is not advertised with its own swimming pool. Both apartment types are described as one-bedroom homes. No approved floor areas have been disclosed, so there is no sound basis for a price-per-square-metre comparison or for assuming that the two options offer the same usable space.

The whole-building option is more than a marketing label, at least in the proposed design. The company describes an internal lockable door between the floors so the property could work as one home or as two independent rental units. That could suit an owner alternating between personal stays and different rental arrangements. Yet the commercial flexibility is only useful if the eventual lease assignments, building rules, access rights and operational permissions all allow it. A drawing with a connecting door cannot settle those questions.

Two owners sharing a building also share potential maintenance problems. Live Your Bali says each apartment will have separate prepaid electricity metering and distribution, separately routed water and drainage, accessible service shafts, acoustic separation and waterproofing tests. Those details are worth examining because a leaking upstairs bathroom or poorly insulated floor can affect the other apartment immediately. They remain proposed technical measures until drawings, specifications and handover evidence demonstrate what was actually built. The eventual allocation of structural repairs, roof works and shared services deserves particular attention.

The developer expects apartments to be handed over furnished rather than as empty shells. Its published list mentions beds and mattresses, fitted kitchen appliances and tableware, air-conditioning, lights, curtains, textiles, bathroom fixtures and outdoor furnishings; the Garden design adds landscaped outdoor space and a pool. This should make a remote purchase easier to plan, provided the final specification is sufficiently precise. At present there is no examined contractual schedule of finishes, brands, substitutions, warranties or delivery standards, so “turnkey” should be read as the intended package rather than proof of what a buyer will receive.

The address remains broader than a normal property listing. The developer places Four Oases in Nyanyi, Tabanan, and describes it as roughly a five-minute drive from Nuanu Creative City, near Nyanyi Beach. Nuanu publishes its own address on Jalan Pantai Nyanyi in Beraban, Kediri, Tabanan. That helps locate the general area, but it is the address of Nuanu, not evidence that Four Oases occupies the same road or parcel. No independently established project coordinates, plot identifier or street-level address are available. Driving times are developer estimates and may vary considerably with traffic.

Nuanu itself is an established destination offering cultural events, activities, learning spaces and places to spend time. The area could appeal to guests interested in that part of Bali rather than the busier Canggu corridor. Equally, the connection needs to be tested from the actual entrance to the future property. The advertised rice-field outlook is another important distinction between the Garden and Sky experiences, but an outlook shown in marketing material is not a protected easement or promise that neighbouring plots will remain undeveloped.

The project has not reached the construction stage according to the company’s current presentation. As of 21 October 2026, Live Your Bali describes Four Oases as being prepared for pre-sale, with architectural and permit work under way and the legal package still being finalised. It specifically says construction has not started. No reliable handover date for Four Oases is established. Progress photographs, delivery schedules and other claims about the developer’s different Bayuh project cannot be used to fill that gap. A buyer here is evaluating a proposed development rather than a completed or nearly completed home.

The intended transaction is a transfer of long-term contractual lease rights to a specifically defined apartment. The developer describes a notarised underlying land lease running to 2055 and an opportunity for a further thirty years. Neither the land lease nor the form of assignment for an individual unit has been inspected in this research. That distinction matters especially with stacked homes: an agreement needs to define which areas are exclusively occupied, what remains shared, who pays for external stairs and pool equipment, and whether the rights may be transferred or inherited. The developer’s language about an extension is not a substitute for the actual operative clauses.

Pricing is not settled in the material currently offered to prospective buyers. The current project display says “on request”, while other indexed pages on the company’s domain still carry an earlier “from USD 179,000” figure. Without a dated unit-specific offer it would be misleading to describe that earlier number as today’s entry price. Approved sizes, a Garden-versus-Sky price schedule, buyer taxes and fees, the project-specific payment timetable and a delivery commitment are also missing. The company says that it will not take payments before a notary has confirmed the final legal structure in writing.

Ownership would not automatically include a management contract. The developer says buyers may choose their own manager rather than appointing a mandatory operator, a feature that gives more control but also places more work and uncertainty on the owner. A shared service charge is contemplated for common access and infrastructure; the amount has not been fixed publicly. Electricity, internet, metered water and the upkeep of private outside areas are treated separately in the proposed arrangement. No verified rental history or net-income forecast exists for these unbuilt apartments, and nearby activity at Nuanu cannot establish occupancy or yields for a specific future unit.

Four Oases therefore has enough disclosed substance to be a real project worth assessing: a specific eight-apartment arrangement, two distinct living experiences, a whole-villa option and a named development brand. What it lacks is not a persuasive description but transaction-ready evidence. A parcel-specific legal pack, approved plans, building permissions, precise areas, contracted finishes, a current unit offer and a dependable completion programme would change the quality of the decision substantially. Until then, the sensible comparison is between an early-stage proposition and other opportunities with more documented rights, prices and delivery obligations.