Yu Di Villa

The strongest recent sale reference is a bank-owned two-bedroom townhouse listed at THB 1.79 million. The advertisement records a 28 sq wah land plot, 97.75 sqm of house area, one bathroom and a single storey, and the portal marks the listing as sold in May 2026. That does not prove the final transaction price, but it gives a concrete and recent resale asking-price anchor. A separate rental listing from August 2025 shows a different product: a two-storey, two-bedroom, two-bathroom townhouse on 21 sq wah, advertised at THB 10,000 per month. The two examples are useful precisely because they are different — they show why project-wide averages would hide the variation a buyer actually needs to inspect.

The setting is local and residential rather than resort-front. A dedicated project profile places the community at 73/5 Soi Suk Sombun 4, Nong Pla Lai, Bang Lamung, Chon Buri 20150. A unit-specific rental listing instead describes access from the railway-side road via Soi Wat Nong Ket Yai. Those references are consistent with the same local area, but they are a reminder to pin the exact house and entrance before a viewing rather than rely on a project name alone. Nearby-source data points to convenience stores, Pattaya Technical College and hospitals within the broader Bang Lamung area. The proposition here is everyday access to local services, not a self-contained resort ecosystem.

Public project documentation is thin. No official developer website or brochure surfaced in the research, and the developer brand or project company could not be established from the exact-name searches. The sources also do not provide a verified unit count, master plan, project land area, official unit schedule or a dependable statement of common-area charges. Major project portals showed no live Yu Di Villa stock at the time of checking. For an older resale community, that is not unusual, but it changes the due-diligence focus: the selected house, title documents, physical condition, access, any community rules and recurring charges matter more than a developer presentation.

There is a material conflict in the chronology. One project profile states that the community was completed in 2017, while the bank-owned listing describes its specific one-storey townhouse as about 30 years old. Those two statements cannot responsibly be turned into one completion year without primary records, so no completion date is published in the structured data. The sensible approach is to verify age and renovation history at house level. In established low-rise housing, roofing, drainage, electrical work, plumbing, additions and moisture exposure can vary significantly from one unit to the next even when the houses share the same project name.

Ownership needs the same unit-level discipline. One project profile labels the tenure as a full sale/freehold form, but that label does not remove Thailand's restrictions on foreign land ownership. A townhouse is tied to an underlying land plot, and direct land ownership by a foreign individual is generally unavailable except under narrow statutory exceptions. A foreign buyer therefore needs to see the land title, identify the registered owner and understand the legally available structure for the particular home before paying a reservation or deposit. A portal tenure label is not a substitute for that document check.

Taken together, Yu Di Villa looks like a project where the individual resale house matters more than the project brand. There is a recent sale asking-price reference, evidence of different townhouse formats and a reasonably clear physical location, but very little public developer-level documentation. That can work for a buyer who is comfortable evaluating an existing home one by one. It is a less natural fit for someone looking for a standardized new-build product, a managed rental programme, resort amenities or a single developer pack that answers every question before the viewing.