What the sources support
There is more substance here than an unbuilt-project brochure: operating accommodation, published project addresses and independent coverage of Kiara Ocean Place's 2025 opening. Both Mirah websites identify PT Mirah Global Investment. None of that, however, establishes clean title, valid building approvals or the correct contracting party for a buyer's particular unit. Those remain matters for document review.
Amali's ownership language is a practical reason to request that review early. The Russian sales site promotes a 100-year leasehold with a possible further 50 years, while the English project page uses 'lifetime ownership' language. These descriptions are not interchangeable legal rights. Indonesia's land regime distinguishes Hak Milik, Hak Pakai, Hak Guna Bangunan and contractual leases; a foreign individual cannot simply acquire Indonesian land under Hak Milik. A buyer needs to know the underlying registered land interest, the structure actually offered to that buyer and how its duration or renewal works.
Even the published apartment count at Kiara Ocean Place is not entirely uniform. The launch release and trade coverage say 62, while Mirah's 2025 annual review says 63. This is not grounds to infer a defect, but a unit-specific purchase must be based on the approved plan and sale documentation rather than a portfolio summary. We did not find independent project-level proof of PBG building approvals, SLF functional certification or the legal handover status of every unit.
Mirah also says that The Guest Society oversees parts of its operating hospitality portfolio. Investors should establish whether that company, another group entity or a third-party manager actually owes them the rental-management obligations. Related branding is not the same as contractual recourse.