The Title Vivana Kamala

The identity is reasonably clean once primary material is given priority. The Title Vivana, Vivana Kamala and The Title Vivana Kamala all refer to the same development. Both the official project page and brochure show four buildings—A, B, C and D—and no separately marketed second phase with its own specifications has been found. FazWaz and Hipflat display five buildings, a discrepancy that is not supported by the developer’s masterplan or the detailed launch reviews. The registry therefore uses four buildings as the confirmed configuration, while keeping the portal conflict visible for a later check against the final registered condominium plan rather than silently blending the two versions.

The apartment mix is more varied than a simple ‘one- and two-bedroom’ label suggests. The official brochure lists seven formats: 30 sqm, 32–36 sqm, 40–44 sqm and 50–56 sqm one-bedrooms; 60–66 sqm two-bedrooms; 89–100 sqm two-bedroom penthouses; and 121–128 sqm two-bedroom-plus penthouses. That creates a meaningful ladder from a compact holiday or single-person home to layouts that can support long stays and family life. Within the same bedroom count, the area spread is large enough that buyers should compare exact plans rather than assume all one-bedrooms or all two-bedrooms are interchangeable. Room proportions, terraces, service zones and furniture placement can matter more than the category name.

Two detailed launch reviews describe the apartments as fully furnished, but a buyer should treat the contract specification—not the phrase itself—as the deliverable. Off-plan furniture packages often raise practical questions: which appliances are included, how many air-conditioning units are supplied, whether loose furniture is part of the package, and which finishes or sanitary fittings can change before handover. The safest approach is to obtain the specification for the exact layout being reserved and have it attached to the sale documentation. That gives the handover inspection a concrete benchmark and prevents a rendered show unit from becoming the informal standard for a contract that promises something narrower.

Vivana’s amenity programme is one of the better documented parts of the project. The brochure and launch material include a main pool, a 25-metre lap pool, children’s pool, whirlpool and hot-water features, sauna and steam rooms, gym, yoga room, co-working and co-kitchen space, meeting room, games lounge, laundry, children’s play areas, outdoor lounges and dedicated pet spaces. A detailed launch review puts common areas at around 5,230 sqm, while the developer’s sustainability material refers to more than 1,800 sqm of green space. Those numbers should not be read as a promise of tranquillity; they are useful because they let a buyer inspect where facilities sit relative to a chosen building and how many residents will share them.

Building A being pet-friendly is a meaningful differentiator for buyers who actually live with an animal, but it needs to be read precisely. A pet-friendly building does not automatically mean unrestricted pets across every common area or identical rules in Buildings B, C and D. Weight limits, breed rules, the number of animals, designated lifts, cleaning obligations and access to landscaped areas may only become fully clear in the juristic rules. If pet ownership is a core reason for choosing Vivana, those rules should be requested in writing before reservation. Otherwise a buyer can end up purchasing for a feature that works much more narrowly in practice than the sales label implies.

Parking is a good example of why even first-party material needs cross-checking. The text version of the official project page says 115 car spaces, while the official brochure shows 155 standard spaces, including eight EV spaces and seven accessible spaces, plus 34 parallel-parking positions. The brochure describes this as 42% without parallel parking and 52% including it, and the detailed ThinkofLiving launch review repeats the 155 figure. The dossier therefore uses 155 as the better-supported number but does not hide the official-page inconsistency. More importantly, none of these ratios means every apartment comes with a private bay; buyers who need regular car parking should confirm allocation and usage rules before signing.

Completion dates also vary across the market. ThinkofLiving and CondoNayoo, both reporting around launch, give Q4 2028; Phuket.pro currently lists November 2028; FazWaz and Hipflat use April 2029. Q4 2028 is the most consistent launch-era target and is therefore used in the registry, but a portal date should never replace the contractual handover clause. Because the project was still in the sales stage in the latest corporate filing and construction was expected to start in Q4 2026, buyers should focus on the legally agreed completion date, any grace period, remedies for delay and the inspection/transfer process rather than treating a single marketing month as guaranteed.

Current asking prices illustrate how quickly the commercial layer moves. A DDproperty listing published on 10 August 2026 asks THB 3.679 million for a 30 sqm one-bedroom and labels the tenure freehold. Phuket.pro’s inventory checked against a price list dated 14 August starts at THB 3.692 million. The registry uses THB 3.679 million as the lowest current market anchor found, not as a developer-guaranteed starting price. A foreign buyer should verify several items together: exact unit number, view and floor, registered area, final price, whether the apartment is still available, and whether foreign quota remains available for that unit. A headline ‘from’ price is only useful once all of those match the intended purchase.

FazWaz currently publishes a common-area fee of THB 85 per sqm per month and a one-off sinking fund of THB 850 per sqm. These are useful due-diligence reference points, but the official material reviewed for this dossier does not independently lock them in. A buyer should therefore request the current fee sheet before contract signing and check the billing period, advance-payment requirement, sinking-fund basis, meter or connection charges and the mechanism for future fee changes after the condominium juristic person is formed. Ownership costs are not just a footnote on a resort-style project with extensive pools, landscaping and shared facilities; they are part of the long-term economics of the apartment.

For an overseas buyer, Vivana sits within Thailand’s standard condominium ownership framework. Foreign freehold is available only within the statutory foreign quota, limited to 49% of the aggregate unit area of the registered condominium. Current listings do show apartments marketed as Foreign Quota/freehold, but that is not evidence that every unit—or the same unit several months later—will be eligible. The quota status of the exact apartment should be confirmed before money becomes non-refundable. If quota is unavailable, foreign freehold cannot be registered; any leasehold structure should be reviewed on its own contractual terms rather than treated as an automatic substitute for registered ownership.

The project makes the most sense for a buyer who is comfortable buying before construction, wants Kamala rather than a busier central Phuket location, prefers low-rise buildings and expects to use the facilities rather than merely admire them in renders. Larger one-bedrooms, two-bedrooms and penthouses broaden the use case beyond short holidays, while the pet-friendly building and work-from-home spaces add practical reasons to live there. The trade-offs are equally clear: it is not ready, it is not beachfront, parking is not one-to-one and some key commercial terms still need contract-level confirmation. The best way to judge Vivana is therefore unit by unit—building, orientation, amenity exposure, quota, furniture schedule, payment milestones and contractual handover date.