Ratchada Ville

The most defensible address is on Soi Ratchadaphisek 36 Yaek 19-8, Chan Kasem, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900. DDproperty and Hipflat agree on the soi and subdistrict. SoiDB adds the building range 238/1–210, while a Yellow Pages record for a company carrying the Ratchada Ville building name uses number 238 on Ratchadaphisek Road in the same subdistrict. The property sits inside the branching residential soi network rather than directly on the main Ratchadaphisek frontage. FazWaz and SoiDB place Lat Phrao MRT at roughly 2.1 km; ZmyHome gives about 1.9 km to the Lat Phrao Yellow Line station. In practical terms, this is not a station-door condominium. Buyers who depend on rail transit should test the first and last part of the trip at the times they actually expect to travel.

The live resale market is very thin at the time of research. One studio, listing ID U6500768, is being syndicated across several portals. It is a 25.25 sqm ground-floor unit listed on 25 June 2026. Thai-language FazWaz, KaiBaanThai and related feeds show a reduced asking price of THB 900,000 from THB 1.6M, with KaiBaanThai showing a same-day update when checked. The English FazWaz page for exactly the same listing ID, however, still displays THB 1.6M. This is a real data conflict, not a reason to average the two numbers. We use THB 900,000 as the lower observable market anchor because it is repeated across several current feeds, but the seller needs to confirm the executable price and whether the listing is still available before the number is used for any negotiation or return calculation.

There is no reliable archived developer floor-plan schedule in the sources reviewed. The current live listing confirms a 25.25 sqm studio. ZmyHome's sold-property archive also records a 28.29 sqm unit described as one bedroom within Ratchada Ville. Older resale material shows that rooms have been renovated and marketed in different configurations over time, which is normal for a building of this age. For that reason, the unit cards below describe observed resale formats rather than an authenticated original mix. A buyer should rely on the title deed, registered floor area and the physical inspection of the selected unit, especially where walls have been moved or a studio has been marketed as a one-bedroom after renovation.

Confirmed common facilities are basic. DDproperty and FazWaz both identify car parking, CCTV and 24-hour security, while Hipflat also confirms parking and security. We did not carry across long amenity lists that appear on some directory pages without matching evidence elsewhere. That restraint is important because the investment case for Ratchada Ville should not depend on an unverified pool, gym or lifestyle package. Parking allocation, visitor rules, access-control systems, lift condition and the maintenance schedule still need a building-level check. A buyer comparing this property with a newer project should therefore compare total ownership cost and building management quality, not simply count icons on listing portals.

The original developer remains unverified. DDproperty explicitly shows no project owner information, FazWaz lists the developer as unavailable, and neither PropertyHub nor Hipflat provides a confirmed developer brand. Thailand-Property associates the project with a database label called “208WirelessRoad”, but we found no independent evidence establishing that label as the legal developer of Ratchada Ville. Yellow Pages has a company named อาคารรัชดาวิลล์ จำกัด at number 238 in the same location, yet the directory does not state whether it was the original developer, a building company, a management entity or another related party. We therefore leave the developer field out rather than converting a weak directory association into a fact. For a completed resale building, that does not prevent a transaction, but it makes unit-level title and juristic-person due diligence more important.