Yuruay Condo Nawamin 135

The original product was intentionally compact. Current developer stock is presented as a 22 sqm studio with one bathroom, fitted furniture and air conditioning. Launch-era material recorded three studio formats: approximately 22.21–22.81 sqm, 24.71–26.07 sqm and 49.98–52.14 sqm. On today’s resale market, many of the 22–23 sqm homes are labelled as one-bedroom units even though the original project material described the core product as a studio. That is a useful warning about portal taxonomy: a listing label is not a substitute for the registered floor plan. For a purchase, the title area, actual internal layout and any alterations are more important than whether an agent calls the unit a studio or a one-bedroom. The larger historical layouts are documented as part of the original mix, but they are not separately marketed in current developer stock, so present-day availability has to be established on the resale market.

The pricing picture is split between remaining developer stock and the resale market. Current developer stock is advertised from THB 988,900 for a 22 sqm studio. In contrast, a properly identified resale unit of 22.32 sqm was being offered at THB 588,000 in a listing renewed in September 2026, and other 2026 listings show small units spread across the mid-THB 500,000s to above THB 800,000. Asking rents visible during the same period are around THB 4,000–5,000 per month for roughly 22–23 sqm units. Those are asking figures, not completed transaction prices or guaranteed rental performance. The practical implication is that buyers should compare the exact unit against both developer stock and the secondary market. Floor, building, fit-out, arrears, legal status and foreign-quota eligibility can explain large differences between superficially similar apartments.

The common facilities are deliberately basic. Verified features include 24-hour security, CCTV, key-card access, floor-controlled lifts, landscaped common areas and 820 motorcycle parking spaces. The major constraint is resident car parking: the project was designed without standard car spaces for unit owners, with only short-stay drop-off or visitor bays described. That should be treated as a first-order buying criterion, not a footnote. A buyer who drives every day may find that the low purchase price is offset by the inconvenience of arranging parking elsewhere. For someone who relies on a motorcycle, taxis, buses and onward connections to Bangkok’s rail network, the trade-off may be more reasonable. A swimming pool and full fitness centre are not part of the verified project specification, so buyers should not assume those facilities are available.

Published running-cost figures are THB 25 per sqm per month for the common-area fee and THB 300 per sqm for the sinking-fund contribution. The figures are consistent across detailed project records, but they should still be checked against the current juristic-person invoice and regulations before a purchase because charges can change. The development was built in two five-building phases. Contemporary records put phase one in 2019 and phase two on a 2020 completion timeline, while several later directories compress the project to a single 2019 completion year. That discrepancy no longer changes the present construction status: the project is complete and ready to occupy. For due diligence, the registration and records of the specific building are more useful than forcing the whole ten-building development into one simplified completion date.