Magnolias Ratchadamri Boulevard

Tenure is the point that changes how this project should be evaluated. The CBRE factsheet explicitly identifies Magnolias Ratchadamri Boulevard as a leasehold condominium, and MQDC corporate disclosure describes the development as a 30-year long-term lease project. This is therefore not the usual foreign-buyer question of whether a freehold condominium unit is still available within the 49% foreign quota. A resale buyer needs to understand the lease rights attached to the exact residence: when the underlying term began, how much time remains, whether the transaction is an assignment or a new registered sub-lease, which consents are required, and what the contract actually says about extension. Older project reviews mention a 30+20-year structure, but an additional 20 years should not be treated as guaranteed unless the selected unit's documentation supports it.

The current market is a resale market, and asking prices have a wide spread. DDproperty showed a one-bedroom unit of about 50 sqm at THB 6.9M in listings reposted in June 2026, while Embark's July 2026 snapshot also put the market floor at THB 6.9M. Larger units sit far above that entry level. Price alone is not enough to compare two residences here. Renovation, furniture, floor, aspect and open views matter, but so does the remaining lease term. Two apartments with similar floor area can have materially different economic profiles if their lease documentation or remaining term differs. A low headline price is useful as a budget anchor; it is not a substitute for checking the legal package behind the unit.

The original unit structure is unusually clear. MQDC records 88 one-bedroom residences, 220 two-bedroom residences, 2 penthouses and 6 duplex penthouses, for a total of 316. CBRE's project factsheet gives the original size bands as 48–60 sqm for one bedrooms, 72–106 sqm for two bedrooms, 292–301 sqm for penthouses and 253–369 sqm for duplex penthouses. The practical implication is that the building is not a tower dominated by tiny studios. Most of the recurring resale inventory is one- and two-bedroom stock, with the two-bedroom category making up by far the largest share of the project. That gives buyers a more useful comparison set when looking at condition, lease term, floor and view.

The residence facilities include a dedicated lobby and drop-off, residents' lounge, fitness room, swimming pool with children's pool and Jacuzzi, steam and sauna rooms, changing facilities and a landscaped slope garden. MQDC corporate material has also described a private club, library, business facilities, meeting areas, jogging space, valet parking and 24-hour security. The presence of Waldorf Astoria in the same tower is a genuine feature of the development, but it should not be turned into a blanket promise of hotel privileges. Restaurant, spa or hotel-service access for condominium residents can be governed by current operating rules and commercial terms. A buyer should confirm what is included today rather than relying on launch-era marketing language.

Historic running-cost information is available, although it should not be mistaken for a 2026 fee schedule. CBRE's 2018 factsheet stated a THB 1,000 per sqm sinking fund payable on sub-lease registration and a THB 90 per sqm per month maintenance fee, paid 12 months in advance. That is enough to show that carrying costs deserve attention, especially for the very large penthouse formats. Before purchase, the current management statement should be checked for the live fee, any unit arrears, parking rules, transfer or assignment charges and any special assessments. The older numbers are useful context; they are not a quote for the next owner.

There is one material source conflict on completion timing. DDproperty, FazWaz and many market profiles label the project as completed in 2015. MQDC's own corporate disclosure, however, records Q2 2017 as the completion period, and a CBRE factsheet from 2018 already described the residences as ready to move in. The registry therefore uses Q2 2017 as the stronger corporate date while preserving the 2015 market convention as an unresolved discrepancy. For a present-day buyer, the exact historical year is less important than the building's current condition and the unit documents, but the disagreement is a useful reminder not to let an aggregator's project card substitute for due diligence.